Expressing shock in excess of non-release of payment to the farmers concerned even six years soon after announcement of compensation in lieu of their land’s acquisition for a household sector in Rohtak in 2009, a local courtroom has rapped the authorities of Haryana Shehri Vikas Pradhikaran (HSVP).
“The harmless farmers are running from pillar to put up, but the senior governing administration officers are sitting about the documents and the payment is becoming delayed deliberately. They are neither earning payment nor are they appearing in advance of the courtroom to explain the reason,” observed Rohtak Added District Choose Guy Pal Ramawat in an purchase on Oct 29.
Issuing a bailable warrant for HSVP’s chief controller of finance, the court docket additional explained: “It has arrive on file that the payment is getting withheld due to the fact of the fault of the Chief Controller of Finance, HSVP. He is not showing up in advance of the court as directed in the very last purchase nor outlining the motive for hold off in payment. Hence, he is not building compliance of the order handed by this court docket. So, his bailable warrant in the sum of Rs 20,000 be issued for November 23, 2021, and the exact be executed by SP, Panchkula, with a pink ink notice that in situation the same is not executed, the SP Panchkula, shall look to clarify the motive. Due to the fact, the Main Controller of Finance, HSVP, is not complying with the orders handed by this court, so it is directed that his salary shall not be introduced till he makes compliance of the order of this court.”
Mentioning “since the payment is being delayed in this execution”, the courtroom has asked the senior officers of HSVP like Main Administrator and Administrator of Rohtak, Rohtak’s Land Acquisition Officer and Rohtak’s Deputy Collector to show up in particular person in advance of the court docket on the upcoming day. The court docket has also directed the courtroom staff members to send a duplicate of the get to Haryana Chief Secretary for needed action in opposition to HSVP’s Chief Controller of Finance and all other officers anxious who are making needless delay in payment. The courtroom reported: “An entry regarding this order be also produced in the provider document of Main Controller of Finance.by (obviously) stating that this officer does not comply with the orders passed by the court intentionally. The action taken as well as compliance report be submitted by the Main Secretary.on the day fastened by way of (an) affidavit.”
The situation concerns the acquisition of land from farmers who experienced tiny chunks of land in the condition of plots in close proximity to Rohtak, for producing Sector 6 of the town. Advocate K L Khera, who is battling a legal struggle for 115 impacted folks out of a full of all around 250, explained to The Indian Express that almost 32-33 acres of land was acquired though the compensation has been given to only a number of persons till date.
Before, September 24 was set for release of payment in 91 instances. That working day, the courtroom had said: “In all the executions payment has been sanctioned by Administrator HUDA (now HSVP), Rohtak. Thereafter demand for spending plan has been built to Main Controller of Finance, HSVP, Panchkula. It is submitted that just one letter dated 30.07.2021 was also composed.to the Chief Controller of Finance.the payment could not be manufactured in all executions mainly because the Chief Controller of Finance.has not sent the essential budget. Now, only the Chief Controller of Finance.can reveal as to why the payment has not been manufactured.”
On September 24, the judge had warned that the court docket will acquire important action if the Main Controller of Finance doesn’t seem before the court on the fastened date (October 29). Even so, the court noticed the Chief Controller of Finance did not seem ahead of the court on Oct 29 nor has any payment been built in any of the execution pertaining to the award in issue, nor has any affidavit been submitted.
On its portion, the governing administration pleaders sought a quick adjournment distributing that “all the working officials have been termed in the head workplace to type out the issue”. The courtroom declined the request.